Tuesday, November 9, 2010

The Struggle for Equality - Feminism


In ‘Blame it on Feminism’, Susan Faludi discusses how in their struggle for equality and freedom, women have actually found misery and unhapiness.
Our society is constantly reminding us that being a woman now, or over the past decades, is ‘good fortune’; we have opportunities women did not have 100 years ago.  We can study, we can work, join law firms, apply for credit at any bank. Any bank!. Nevertheless, there is the other side of the coin. Women have never been more miserable. Faludi says that “professional women are suffering an infertility epidemic, single women are grieving from a man shortage, and unwed women are hysterical and crumbling under a profound crisis of confidence”.  Women’s freedom and power, is the cause of their misery. “Women are enslaved by their own liberation”. So, why is only half of the truth portrayed? To some extent, that might be what men want to show, what they want our society and women to think. To believe women have made it, that we have won the ‘fight for equality’.

Susan Faludi’s ‘Blame it on Feminism’ conveys several ideas that can be closely linked to Margaret Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’, dystopian novel that describes life in the fundamentalist Republic of Gilead, where women are valued only if their ovaries are viable. In Atwood’s novel, women are strictly monitored by men, and have no property of their own, since it was taken away from them.
My interpretation of the novel runs parallel with Faludi’s article, since she suggests that “women’s distress was an unfortunate consequence of feminism”.
Although in ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ it is not quite explicit, one can understand that before the Republic of Gilead was created, women’s power and role in society was increasing. Take the main character, Offred, as an example. She had a job and a bank account that were both suddenly taken away from her. Women’s role in society was becoming so strong, that people began to feel the need of reducing it, or even going to the extreme and taking it all away. Thus the suffering of women.

Moreover, towards the end of article, Faludi describes a backlash on feminism during the 1980’s, period characterized for the government of American President Ronald Reagan. In her article, Faludi describes the existence of a younger ‘postfeminist generation’ that was against the women’s movement. By the 1980’s fundamentalist ideologies in American government led to a resistance to women’s rights, accepted politically and socially, finally passing on to ‘the popular culture. It is during this period of American history that the ‘backlash’ struck feminist ideals. This backlash is also portrayed in Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ by the quick change in the mentality of the Aunts. These characters are supposed to train and monitor the Handmaid’s.

When comparing ‘Blame it on Feminism’ and ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’, one can see the background of the novel and how Margaret Atwood was criticizing American society when writing her novel. From my point of view, the ‘Postfeminist generation’ must have wanted to create a sort of dystopia for those women who were trying to achieve their equality of gender and freedom, since their ideals were inmediately argued and contradicted by the government. 

Monday, November 1, 2010

"Barbie, real life stories."

Both Gilman and Higginbotham’s texts discuss the modern portrayal of women and society. Barbies and Teen Mags, as Higginbotham calls them, create girls “fantasy life and extend their ambitions”, making them aspire to an ideal, which is somehow false.
Barbie dolls have formed part of girls childhood since the late 1950’s; a very westernized toy that ‘human beings actively try to mimic’, making it not only a children’s doll, but ‘an adult cult and an aesthetic obsession’. As Gilman says, Barbies portray this perfect woman with ‘white blond hair, burnt orange Malibu skin, unblinking turquoise eyes and hot pink convertibles; completely stupid, perfect, and of course false. I remember discussing with my parents about Barbies, and asking them why they did not buy me these popular and beautiful dolls; ‘I don’t like the image they show’, would say my dad. I thought it was crazy; Barbies were perfect and I envied my friends that would own tons of Barbies, hundreds of different outfits, the mansions, the convertibles, the jeeps, and of course the guy. I can now understand what my dad was trying to say, and I agree on what Gilman says; Barbies create a stereotype of the perfect woman, an impossible model for a girl to reach.
Because of this image girls no longer feel content with who they are or what they have. I quote Gilman here”if you didn’t look like a Barbie, you didn’t fit in. Your status was diminished. You were less beautiful, less valuable, less worthy”.
What about the other side of Barbie? Gilman gives a list of Barbies she would like to see in the market: Dinner Roll Barbie, Bisexual Barbie, Birkenstock Barbie, , Body Piercings Barbie, and so on and so on. Barbies that show what life really is about, that being different isn’t bad, but good, being smart, being voluptuous, dressing in your own style, not the pink girly way Barbie is, is something to be proud of and that makes each and anyone of us special. Not only that but that we can’t be perfect. A friend actually conveyed this idea through art, using a Barbie Doll. She called it ‘BARBIE, real life cases’. In her pictures she shows alcoholic, menopausic and single mom Barbies. 

It’s not only Barbies that portray a false perfect image to girls, but also Teen Magazines. These magazines also tend to create an ideal of a woman, where she gets the boys, is popular, thin and dresses well. Magazines like YM, Seventeen, Sassy, Vogue, Cosmopolitan and Mademoiselle in some way restrict girls to grow into their what THEY want, in order for them to sell. Thin girls that follow their restricted ‘seven day diets’, follow their advices after Love Crisis’, etc. What struck me the most is how these magazines contradict themselves. Higginbotham explains how teen magazines ‘tend to encourage girls to love their bodies, no matter what they look like’, however they only show ‘stick thin, flawless faced white models in expensive outfits’. Higginbotham’s title resumes everything ‘Teen Mags: How to get a guy, drop 20 pounds, and lose your self-esteem’. Because in this transformation and aspirations to be ‘perfect’, we lose our true identity, trying to become someone we are not but someone that society wants us to be. 

What happens if we don’t want to be like Barbie or the skinny girl in the front cover of Seventeen Magazine? These magazines should start featuring what’s really happening in the world, ‘show the whole spectrum’; not discriminate against any racial, physical or sexual differences, and admit that being who we are, we are just as perfect. No need to get the perfect guy, drop 20 pounds. Just be ourselves.

Articles:
‘Klaus barbie, and other dolls I’d like to see’ by Susan Jane Gilman
‘Teen Mags: How to get a guy, drop 20 pounds, and lose your self esteem’ by Anastasia Higginbotham
Picture:
Anais Freitas - 'Barbie, casos de la vida real'


 

Thursday, October 28, 2010

‘Silence is power’


Both ‘Talking Back’ and ‘Sins of Silence’ express the suffering women have to go throughout their lives due to the suppression of family and male figures.  Although this issue is not anything new, I found them very interesting because of how each of these women, Bell Hooks and Mai Kao Thao, were educated by their families and how their cultures mold them differently regarding this issue.

I was personally more shocked by Mai Kao Thao’s experience rather than Bell Hooks because of her mother’s attitude, her education, culture and her decision to remain silent knowing she shouldn’t. Mai Kao Thao begins her paper by remembering her mom’s words: ‘always be a good, obedient woman, and smile silently to the bitterness of others’. Due to their culture, Thao and her mother would not ‘talk back’ as Bell Hooks did, thus accepting the condition they lived in and how they were treated. Her mother’s acceptance actually bothered me a little, since she was always trying to suggest that by remaining silent and allowing men to abuse of them, things would be much better since they could avoid conflict. Although both of them reamin silent, one can clearly see Mai Kao Thao’s real feelings. She is able to convey her feelings in a very simple and direct way, highlighting very strong words, leaving them as single sentences. She writes, ‘I was a good girl. Wordless. Humble. Obedient. A perfect Hmong woman’ and ‘I was stone. Silent. Hard. Emotionless. Nothing was going to hurt me’. The contraction between the words reveals the reality of her situation; how she, as well as many women in her society, appear to be, and how they actual feel.
Mai Kao Thao finally concludes by suggesting that if she were to break the silence, she would no longer be a good Hmong woman.

The most notable aspect of Hooks experiences is how women have seemed to look for each other for comfort and to destroy the silence, suggesting that ‘woman talk’, the name she uses to describe this, does give them hope. This ‘woman talk’ has also led Bell Hooks to look for further means of breaking the silence, finding this freedom in writing. I found Hooks story more inspiring since she has actually found a way back into society, not permitting the suppression of family and male figures stop her development as a person. 

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Strange Meeting

A few weeks ago, I wrote about Jane Smiley's novel "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Novel". In the fifth chapter of her novel, titled The Psychology of the Novel, she discusses the importance of the development of the relationship between the reader and the writer and how a novel's basic substance lies within the emotions that are established.
Throughout the entry I supported Smiley's ideas, concluding that the psychology of relationships is one of the factors that defines the quality or anything special about a novel.
In this entry I would like to encourage you to read Strange Meeting, novel written by British writer Susan Hill, which in my opinion is able to portray Smiley's ideas regarding the psychology of relationships that have to be developed in novels.

I read Strange Meeting as a part of my previous school's curriculum. It narrates the lives of two soldiers who become friends while living the horrible experience of the trenches in World War I. I was blown away by this novel. The relationship Susan Hill was able to develop, both within the novel and between the characters and myself, the reader, was simply outstanding. From the first chapter one can feel the characters; well feel for them but also share their feelings and emotions. For a person like me, being able to 'connect' with the novel is the key in defining whether it is good or bad, and if I will or will not continue with my reading. I just encourage you, my readers, to give it a try. Although I haven't been able to find Strange Meeting in any bookstores near home, I shall tell you that I will be reading that novel again in no time.

Blogging Portfolio, October 5


Hey everyone! As the school’s first quarter comes to an end I have selected what I believe are my best blogs and comments. There will be an explanation as to why I chose them and what makes them better than others. I hope you like them, enojy and feel free to comment.

Ignorance=Manipulation, Power

I think this blog covers many of the aspects discussed in class and their similarity with dystopian novels read for the course, ‘We’ and ‘1984’. I really enojyed writing about this particular topic and article since it reveals totalitarian governments from the world we now live in, and I also consider it to be one of my best pieces. It also has a comment from Julie supporting the points I made and suggesting other ideas.

Manipulation of Truth – What is Truth?

As mentioned in this blog, the idea I had of Truth has become more and more complicated to understand and find a definition for it, but finally resolving in the conclusion that both objective and subjective truth are equally valid and can be easily manipulated. In this blog Adrienne and I discussed some of the points I had made in which I tried to answer some questions she had made.
For this blog I made a further research with some websites and books I used for a work I had done in my Theory of Knowledge class, where I had to define Truth. Here they are:
Arthur Prior (1969) Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Xenoblogging

Ability to Manipulate Truth

In Monique’s blog about the Manipulation of Truth and the Obejective Truth Presentation we did during class she claims that “one truth does not exist”, and makes a very interesting point about how it is in humans nature to lie.
She provided good ideas, but did leave the readers with some doubts about it since she asked some rhetorical questions too. Therefore I suggested her to resolve her doubts first and instead of rising questions to the reader, she should either answer them or approach them differently. I also proposed she linked her ideas with dystopian novel 1984.
Inconvenient Truth

In her entry “Inconvenient Truth”, Sabrina also talks about Truth and its manipulation. She was able to develop her ideas clearly and made some very god points, one of which is a quote from a US divorce Lawyer which I really liked.
However, I had some questions which I later asked on her entry, expecting some of them to be cleared, or just to allow Sabrina expand her ideas.

Freedom to Write

I found Julie’s ideas on Writing very captivating, since as I stated in my reply, it applies to modern education. We have been educated in a system in which grading is one of the most important things and we are driven by it. Julie’s ideas on how these grades and rubrics affect our freedom of speech and imagination are really good. And as I asked “Why should we be molded?”.

Interaction

War is Peace, Ignorance is Strength, Freedom is Slavery

I really enjoyed reading Adrienne’s blog, especially this one, on Shin a North Korean boy who once lived in a Gulag or working camp. As mentioned previously, I found this historical topic very interesting to write on, and I felt that Adrienne was able to approach it in an excellent manner, also linking it with 1984.
I commented on her blog, and asked her some questions about it, since some ideas weren’t that clear, thus didn’t understand very much her perspective, specially that on subjective truth. All doubts were resolved once she replied. 

Discussion

Keep it Simple

In this entry I received a comment from my classmate Jorina, in which she was trying to solve her doubts on the ideas I had presented. Her questions gave me an opportunity to explain my perspective and how I did agree with Orwell’s ideas about a simple language.


Wild Card
http://javieraenglish.blogspot.com/2010/10/strange-meeting.html


This entry is just encouraging my readers to take a look at Strange Meeting, a novel I read this year which in my opinion portrays Jane Smiley's idea on the psychology of relationships novels should have, developed in her book "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a novel".